Christian Scientists weigh in, lobby for spiritual care
As one of the Christian Scientists mentioned by the title, “Christian Scientists lobby to add prayer to health bill,” [News, Nov. 26], I’d like to add my perspective.
I have attended a number of local healthcare reform forums over the past two years. Patient choice has always been considered a major priority. People should be able to choose the type of healthcare and the provider they feel is best for themselves and their families. If Americans are to be free to make this choice, and thousands currently choose spiritual care, this amendment must be included.
Some have questioned the constitutionality of the amendment. This is about private insurance companies reimbursing patients for private health care costs. Michael McConnell, who heads the Stanford University Constitutional Law Center, concurs that the amendment is “consistent with constitutional standards.”
The Times article noted, “the clash over spiritual care has become essentially a referendum about whether the government recognizes prayer as a legitimate and viable health care option.” To those who have just been told that there is nothing more that can be done for their loved one or themselves, having another proven healthcare option can be indispensable.
- William E. Scott, Kenmore
Arrived at your web-site when I was looking for some good information for our web site, clearly it’s not all releative nevertheless its amusing how one can reach a web site inadvertently and discover oneself looking at something totally different but just as worthwhile. I tend to get distracted a quite a lot doing this. [ Happy to have you stop by Kevin! And thanks for taking the time to leave a note. - Bill ]